Epstein Secrets

OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO IDENTIFY C.M.A. IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOEN

f, C.M.A., by and through her undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which file to a response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third Party Subpoenas For Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, With Incorp

, by and through her undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which file to a response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third Party Subpoenas For Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, With Incorporated 3

ion until May 25, 2009, for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Identify C.M.A. 3. Defendant's motion seeks to publicly identify C.M.A, a victim of Defendant's sexual abuse. 4. The undersigned has been busy researching and drafting responsive memorandums in opposition to disposit

tiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH

[email protected] Counsel for Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E.

691 [email protected] Counsel for Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen Bruce Reinhart, Esq.

EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF C.M.A'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION T

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

_/ ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RESET TRIAL DATES AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES FOR CASES 08-80811 AND 08-80893 THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Strike Cases from Current Trial Docket and Motion to Continue Case and/or Alternative Motion to Modify Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document

D 08-80893 THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Strike Cases from Current Trial Docke

is otherwise fully advised in the premises. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Epstein’s Motion to Continue (DE 104) is DENIED as to Plaintiffs C.M.A and Jane Doe (80893). After reviewing the parties’ submissions and the record, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion to continue is premature. Th