ion until May 25, 2009, for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Identify C.M.A. 3. Defendant's motion seeks to publicly identify C.M.A, a victim of Defendant's sexual abuse. 4. The undersigned has been busy researching and drafting responsive memorandums in opposition to disposit

EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF C.M.A'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION T

is otherwise fully advised in the premises. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Epstein’s Motion to Continue (DE 104) is DENIED as to Plaintiffs C.M.A and Jane Doe (80893). After reviewing the parties’ submissions and the record, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion to continue is premature. Th