Epstein Secrets

t gov> 09/24/2007 01:27 PM To 'Jay Lefkowitz" cc ' lk(USAFLSV)- bcc Subject RE: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney Hi Jay — Sorry for the delay. The U.S. Attorney had a last-minute concern, that I think I fixed (it is i

A 0111W) SMITS 47-1(Mo2Y olitway BY P&(SIM11.9 Kenneth W, Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Starr ft Mt Area Mont Ft, 33132 0(2)941.9110.7olophoow MMI MILSOM - Amble 1 write in response to your November 2r letter, in which you

uld be so conitimed, our First Assistant informed Mr. Lefkowitt some weeks ago that this was not our position. As Mr. Ladkowitz baa noted, were Mr. F.pstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims M a subsequent Section 2255 suit would still have had some burden to move that they were "victims? it is a

the list is significantly shorter than that Once the list is provided to you, ifyou have a good faitlibasis for asserdng that a victim never met Mr. Bpsteie, we remain willing to listen and to modify the lid if you convince as of your position. _Dully, let meaddress raurobjections to thedraft Victim Not

ssistant U.S. Attorney 1 EFTA00289840 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT • THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT • • Name: Jeffrey-E. Epstein Plea: Guilty Case No. Charge Count_ Lesser Decree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL OBCF009381AMB Procuring Pers

e list Is significantly shorter than that. Once the list is provided to you, ifyou have a good faith basis for asserting that a victim never met Mr. Bp stein, we remain willing to listen and to modify the list if you convince os of yourposItion. Filially, letme address yourobjections to thedraft Victim N

LL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SF.111F.IvIENT Horne: Jeffrey E. Epttein Plea: Gully „X i Case No. ghargatt

LL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SF.111F.IvIENT Horne: Jeffrey E. Epttein Plea: Gully „X i Case No. ghargatt

cts check and it looks alright. Also, to address Mr. Epstein's concern regarding the list of names, I wanted

i or U.S. Department of Justice Untied States Attorney Southern District of F7nrida AUXANDERACOOTA 0111W) SMITS 47-1(Mo2Y olitway BY P&(SIM11.9 Kenneth W, Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Starr ft Mt Area Mont Ft, 33132

TIEFEL,WILLIAM SMITH,HAROLD B COLE,JEFFREY A BRAUER,CAMILLA T LUBOTTA,JACK

OBERT A THE BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC EPSTEIN,JEFFREY TIEFEL,WILLIAM R MCCLOSKEY,

DING CORP UDDEHOLM CORPORATION TICE,KENNETH J H DUNCAN,MIMI G MENDEL,NANCY W

2008. In that communication, we urgently requested that your Office conduct an independent review of the proposed federal prosecution of our client, Jeffrey Epstein. The dual reasons for our request that you review this matter are (i) the bedrock need for integrity in the enforcement of federal criminal laws, and

he Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (“CEOS”) has already determined that our substantive arguments regarding why a federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is not warranted were “compelling.” However, in contradiction to Mr. Sloman’s assertion that CEOS had provided an independent, de novo review, CEOS m

arguments regarding why a federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is not warranted were “compelling.” However, in c

ilt — ae 202) 514-0467 202) 514-2101 Hencvaise Mank lip United States Department of Justice ee ° i202) 2 From: Date: Pages w/eover: Fax #: Direct it: Kenneth W, Starr May 27, 2008 3 (243) 680-8500 (213) 680-8440 Message: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025706