Epstein Secrets

BRILLIANT EVOLUTIONARY GENETICIST AT HARVARD AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHO IS A BRILLIANT FUND AND INVESTMENT MANAGER (P

NT EVOLUTIONARY GENETICIST AT HARVARD AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHO IS A BRILLIANT FUND AND INVESTMENT MANAGER (P

BRILLIANT EVOLUTIONARY GENETICIST AT HARVARD AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHO IS A BRILLIANT FUND AND INVESTMENT MA

hat fits the definition of a psychopath-of the narcissistic kind-or a malevolent narcissist. This presents serious dangers that need to be addressed. Peter Richerson has made several valuable points: 1-Causality could go entirely in the other direction than the one I suggested-people avoid more psychopathic relati

N MY CURRENT RESPONSE-IN CAPITAL LETTERS. I AM ALSO ADDING TWO NAMES TO LIST. DAVID HAIG WHO IS A BRILLIANT EVOLUTIONARY GENETICIST AT HARVARD AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHO IS A BRILLIANT FUND AND INVESTMENT MANAGER (PALM BEACH, NYC, US VIRGIN ISLANDS) WITH BROAD SCIENTIFIC INTERESTS. Dear Gruterites Gordon has n

NT EVOLUTIONARY GENETICIST AT HARVARD AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHO IS A BRILLIANT FUND AND INVESTMENT MANAGER (

BRILLIANT EVOLUTIONARY GENETICIST AT HARVARD AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN WHO IS A BRILLIANT FUND AND INVESTMENT M

fits the definition of a psychopath—of the narcissistic kind—or a malevolent narcissist. This presents serious dangers that need to be addressed. Peter Richerson has made several valuable points: 1—Causality could go entirely in the other direction than the one I suggested— people avoid more psychopathic rela

From: Robert Divers all > To: "Haig, David" Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> Subject: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 03:19:49 +0000 Attachments: TRIVERS_on_PETER.docx dear men i am writing you both because

ientific advance achieved that way—most of what we do is simply concentrated sustained thought directed toward the foundations of a problem i doubt Jeffrey has made a huge amount of money via the EDGE program unless you say otherwise, i will shortly send you the key Getty missives in which he asserts, i

: Robert Divers all > To: "Haig, David" Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> Subject: Date: Mon, 19 M

018 03:19:49 +0000 Attachments: TRIVERS_on_PETER.docx dear men i am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene- culture co-evolutionist—without the genes i do so because four lines down i tell the "Gruterites"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have a

From: "Haig, David" <[email protected]> To: Robert Trivers Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:10:54 +0000 >, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Hi Bob (and hello Jeffrey), I would be happy at the moment not to be on another mailing list. There are just too many diffe

b.harvard.edu> To: Robert Trivers Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:10:54 +0000 >, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Hi Bob (and hello Jeffrey), I would be happy at the moment not to be on another mailing list. There are just too many different things I am trying to attend to (including im

Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:10:54 +0000 >, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Hi Bob (and hello Jeffre

<no subject> dear men Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> i am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-culture co- evolutionist—without the genes i do so because four lines down i tell the "Gruterites"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have a

From: Haig, David Sent: Monday, Marc To: Robert Trivers; Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Hi Bob (and hello Jeffrey), I would be happy at the moment not to be on another mailing list. There are just too many different thin

From: Haig, David Sent: Monday, Marc To: Robert Trivers; Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Hi Bob (and hello Jeffrey), I would be happy at the moment not to be on another mailing list. There are just too many different things I am trying to attend to (including im

Sent: Monday, Marc To: Robert Trivers; Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Hi Bob (and hello Jeffrey), I wo

Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: <no subject> dear men i am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-culture co- evolutionist—without the genes i do so because four lines down i tell the "Gruterites"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have a

From: Sent: To: Robert Trivers 3/19/2018 3:19:49 AM Haig, David I Attachments: TRIVERS on PETER.docx Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Importance: High dear men i am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson

avid I Attachments: TRIVERS on PETER.docx Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Importance: High dear men

Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Importance: High dear men i am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene- culture co-evolutionist-without the genes i do so because four lines down i tell the "Gruterites". -Gordon Getty's echo chamber —that i have

From: Sent: To: Subject: Haig, David 3/19/2018 9:10:54 AM Robert Trivers Re: ; Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Importance: High Hi Bob (and hello Jeffrey), I would be happy at the moment not to be on another mailing list. There are just

3/19/2018 9:10:54 AM Robert Trivers Re: ; Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Importance: High Hi Bob (

<no subject> , Jeffrey Epstein < [email protected]> dear men i am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-culture co- evolutionist —without the genes i do so because four lines down i tell the "Gruterites" - Gordon Getty's echo chamber-that i have

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Robert Trivers Subje

ientific advance achieved that way—most of what we do is simply concentrated sustained thought directed toward the foundations of a problem i doubt Jeffrey has made a huge amount of money via the EDGE program unless you say otherwise, i will shortly send you the key Getty missives in which he asserts, i

, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Robert Trivers < > wrote: dear men i am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene- culture co-evolutionist—without the genes i do so because four lines down i tell the "Gruterites"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have a

e there all best On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:14 AM, jeffrey E. < [email protected]> wrote: i think you might b

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Robert Trivers dear men wrote: i am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene- culture co-evolutionist-without the genes i do so because four lines down i tell the "Gruterites"-Gordon Getty's echo chamber-—that i have a

From: Robert Trivers _ a | Sent: 4/14/2018 5:06:12 PM To: Alan Rogers |i « Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] cc: Gordon Getty i Oliver Goodenough | | Tim Kane EE, Rob Hanson i: Paul Zak |); Bobby McCormick | ey Anderson EE); Clive Cr

4/14/2018 5:06:12 PM To: Alan Rogers |i « Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] cc: Gordon Getty i Oliver

Alan On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Robert Trivers (> wrote: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025589 --- PAGE BREAK --- here is my latest and final comment on Peter Richerson's comments on Gordon's idea about Trump being a narcissistic psychopath—a view with which i firmly agree i have learned a lot by thinking through all