Epstein Secrets

With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his unde

eal, substantial and not remote possibility that Epstein may face criminal prosecution by the United State

intiff, Defendant. ______________ / Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposi

rs and 7 months pending criminal investigation); Ostrow v. U.S., 1986 WL 6855, *1 (M.D. Fla.)(recognizing

2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C.M. A., CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80811-MARRAIJOHNSON Plaintiff, r lEEEREIY EPSTEIN and■ Defendants, v. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Stay And/Or Continue Action

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C.M. A., CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80811-MARRAIJOHNSON Plaintiff, r lEEEREIY EPSTEIN and■ Defendants, v. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Stay And/Or Continue Action For Time Certain With Incorporated Memorandum Of La

EEEREIY EPSTEIN and■ Defendants, v. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposi

tter Carriers, 2006 WL 3791313, *1 (E.D. La. 2006Xgranting motion to stay civil proceeding for 2 years and 7 months pending criminal investigation); Ostrow v, U.S., 1986 WL 6855, *1 (M.D. Fla.)(recognizing a defendant's constitutional rights and allowing 4 EFTA00201287 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Docume

CT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Notice Of Supplemental Authority In Support Of His Reply To Plaintiff's Response In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Stay And/Or Continue Action

Plaintiff's Response In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Stay And/Or Continue Action For Time Certain Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of his Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Op

N DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 -

Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of his Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition (DE 54) to Defendant's Motion to Stay Complaint: 1. Ostrow v. U.S., 1986 WL 6855, *1 (M.D. Fla.Xrecognizing a defendant's constitutional rights and allowing for a stay of the civil case until the criminal a