Epstein Secrets

ses would have been res ipsa, and warranted prosecution to the full extent of the law. The 'Epstein' Case EFTA00064775 But what about cases like Jeffrey Epstein? There seems little question that Epstein, despite his great business success and commendable philanthropic activity, has a sordid history of engagi

cution to the full extent of the law. The 'Epstein' Case EFTA00064775 But what about cases like Jeffrey Epstein? There seems little question that Epstein, despite his great business success and commendable philanthropic activity, has a sordid history of engaging in (criminal) physical relations with

ive, as we ideally might expect them to be. Think Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Kaczynski, El Chapo, John Gotti, Osa

ecutor's discretion.") Is prosecutorial discretion a good thing/? Many argue that it can be lawless and tyrannical. Justice (then Attorney General) Robert H. Jackson famously told us: "If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his cases, it follows that he can choose his defendants. Therein is the most dangerous pow

ach of those cases would have been res ipsa, and warranted prosecution to the full extent of the law. The `Epstein' Case But what about cases like Jeffrey Epstein? There seems little question that Epstein, despite his great business success and commendable philanthropic activity, has a sordid history of engagi

arranted prosecution to the full extent of the law. The `Epstein' Case But what about cases like Jeffrey Epstein? There seems little question that Epstein, despite his great business success and commendable philanthropic activity, has a sordid history of engaging in (criminal) physical relations with

ive, as we ideally might expect them to be. Think Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Kaczynski, El Chapo, John Gotti, Osa

ecutor's discretion.") Is prosecutorial discretion a good thing/? Many argue that it can be lawless and tyrannical. Justice (then Attorney General) Robert H. Jackson famously told us: "If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his cases, it follows that he can choose his defendants. Therein is the most dangerous pow

or prosecution and to select those in which the offense is the most flagrant, the public harm the greatest, and the proof the most certain." (quoting Robert H. Jackson, Attorney Gen. of the U.S., Address to the Second Annual Conference of United States Attorneys: The Federal Prosecutor (Apr. 1, 1940))); 483 Parl Deb

Defining the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 666, 46 Colum. JE. & Soc. Probs. 207, 237-45 (2012) (arguing for br