Epstein Secrets

rent victims have responded by explaining how these documents are relevant, including explaining how these documents might bear on the way in which Epstein used his powerful political and social connections to secure a favorable plea deal, as well as provide proof of the Government's motive to delibera

d be as interested in him as a friend if we had hamburgers on the boardwalk in Coney Island and talked about his ideas.- Vanity Fair Reminds Us When Jeffrey Epstein Warn 't a Creep. by Ray Gustini, in The Wire (June 21, 2011). Second, Jeffrey Epstein brazenly abused numerous girls in his Florida mansion, his New Yo

e criminal prosecution broke) Dershowitz stated "I'm on my 20th book. . . . The only person outside of my immediate family that I send drafts to is Jeffrey." The Talented Mr. Epstein. by Vicky Ward, in Vanity Fair (Jan. 2005).11 Dershowitz has also been quoted as saying that, even if Epstein went bankru

n asked: Do you know what Jeffrey Epstein's relationship is with Alan Dershowitz? That's somebody [i.e., Dershowitz] who you know to have stayed at Jeffery Epstein's house on many occasions, correct? And also somebody who you know to have been at the house when was in Jeffrey Epstein's bedroom getting sexually

in took the Fifth when asked during his deposition "[h]ave you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under the age of Isr• Jeffrey Epstein Depo. at 90, Epstein' Edwards. No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB (Palm. Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. Mar. 17, 2010) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 24). Indeed, going a step

. Dershowitz had sex with minors in concert with Mr. Epstein. Only Prof. Dershowitz is situated to protect hi

ediate family that I send drafts to is Jeffrey." The Talented Mr. Epstein. by Vicky Ward, in Vanity Fair (Jan. 2005).11 De

d be asked about Derhowitz's involvement took the Fifth." This "[sJilence is . . . evidence of the most persuasive character." United States ex rd. Bilokumsky 'Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). quoted in Baxter 1 Palmigiano, 425 U.S 308, 319 (1976). And that silence takes on an even more si

rth is in the hundreds of millions of dollars - if not, indeed, a billion dollars. See, e.g., New York Time, July 1, 2008, at A2 ("Over the weekend Jeffrey E. Epstein, who after years of advising billionaires became a billionaire himself, left his estate on Little St. James Island, with its staff of 70 and its fl

ant PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION RESTRAINING FRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS, APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER TO TAKE CHARGE OF PROPERTY OF EPSTEIN, AND TO POST A $15 MILLION BOND, TO SECURE POTENTIAL JUDGMENT COMES NOW Plaintiff Jane Doe, by and through undersigned counsel, and hereby files t

IS ASSETS. As noted in the material facts above, defendant Epstein is currently making fraudulent transfers of his

ork Time, July 1, 2008, at A2 ("Over the weekend Jeffrey E. Epstein, who after years of advising billionair

ork Time, July 1, 2008, at A2 ("Over the weekend Jeffrey E. Epstein, who after years of advising billionaire

#23. 14. Epstein has blocked all discovery, in this and other related cases, regarding his assets. Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶¶ 7, 8. ARGUMENT I. EPSTEIN IS FRAUDULENTLY TRANSFERRING HIS ASSETS. As noted in the material facts above, defendant Epstein is currently making fraudulent transfers of his as

zed long ago, "[s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character.'" Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 319 (1976) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923)). This is plainly one of those situations. In a civil case, drawing an adverse inference is the proper action

BURMAN CRITTON LUTTIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________ ___;/ DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS (dated 03/23/09) 14] 023/031 D

unsel, and hereby files this Motion for Injunction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64, for appointment of a receiver to take charge of Epstein's property, and to post a $15 million bond to secure any potential judgment in this case, for the reasons explained in the accompanying supporting

ork Time, July 1, 2008, at A2 ("Over the weekend Jeffrey E. Epstein, who after years of advising billionair

ork Time, July 1, 2008, at A2 ("Over the weekend Jeffrey E. Epstein, who after years of advising billionaire

IS ASSETS. As noted in the material facts above, defendant Epstein is currently making fraudulent transfers of his

ed long ago, "[s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character."' Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 319 (1976) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923)). This is plainly one of those situations. In a civil case, drawing an adverse inference is the proper action

ne issue as to any material facts and that Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. is entitled to summary judgment for all claims brought against him in Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Complaint. Not only is there an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Edwards participated in any fraud against Epstein, the evidence un

intiff Jeffrey Epstein's Complaint. Not only is there an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Edwards participated in any fraud against Epstein, the evidence uncontrovertibly demonstrates the propriety of every aspect of Edwards' involvement in the prosecution of legitimate claims against E

inafter "Epstein Depo.") at 67-68. Therefore summary judgment should be granted for Edwards on all claims involving any Ponzi scheme by Rothstein. b. Epstein Did Not Suffer Any Harm from Allegedly Fraudulent Presentations to Investors. 7 EFTA00725975 At various points in his Complaint, Epstein seems t

, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, OR IN THE AL

Y, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 0408003OOOCMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

he most persuasive character."' Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have "evidence of the most

ugh his undersigned counsel, hereby submits this Response in Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein seeks Summary Judgment on the claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution set forth in Brad Edwards’ Fourth Amended Counterclaim. Each of th

Epstein. Sexual Abuse of Children By Epstein 1. Defendant Epstein has a nexual preference for young children. Depos

al complaint with obstruction of justice in eanneetinn with trying to obtain $50,000 from civil attorneys pursuing civil sexual assault cases against Rpatein as payment for producing the book to the attorneys. See Criminal Complaint at 4, US. v. Rodriguez, No. 9:10-CR-80015-KAM (S.D. Fla. 2010) (Exhibit “G

Capp, Esquire Mediation, Inc. Regions Financial Tower 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein Our File No.: 291874 Dear Mr. Capp: Despite the total absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Bradley Edwards participated in any fraud aga

File No.: 291874 Dear Mr. Capp: Despite the total absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Bradley Edwards participated in any fraud against Jeffrey Epstein, and in the face of uncontrovertible evidence demonstrating the propriety of every aspect of Edwards' involvement in the prosecution of legitimate cl

f the most persuasive character.'" Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4" Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have "evidence of the most