Epstein Secrets

l prosecutorial authority. IO 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001653 EFTA00209832 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depar

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United S

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutor

LP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by

enchel advised the defense that the federal government required a minimum term of two years of incarceration. See Tab 40, August 3, 2007 Email from M. Menchel. Subsequently, Ms. 4 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001657 EFTA00209836 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP emailed the defense stating that United States Attorne

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Depart

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United St

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors

ey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clint

enchel advised the defense that the federal government required a minimum term of two years of incarceration. See Tab 40, August 3, 2007 Email from M. Menchel. Subsequently, Ms. 4 EFTA00731149 emailed the defense stating that United States Attorney Acosta would accept no less than 18 months of incarcer

Inc.'s sole business activities related to the operation and ownership of a Gulfstream G-1159B aircraft bearing tail number N909JE. F 9. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN se as president, sole director, and sole shareholder of Hyperion Air, Inc., and had the power to direct all of its operations. 10. Pursuant to Flori

at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida, in the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter referred to as '358 El Brillo Way"). 5. DefendaRFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York (hereinafter referred to as "the New York residence"). 6. Defendant JEFFREY EPS

y Jane Doe #15. (134) In or- around the first half of 2005, Defendant led Jane Doe #15 from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at 358 El Brillo Way. (135) In or around the first half of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN instructed Jane Doe #15, who teas the

Doe # 19? Have you testified about her previously? 2. Has she been interviewed? 3. During what period of time did Jane Doe # 19 have contact with JE? 4. How old was she during that time frame? 5. How did she meet JE? 6. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JET 7. How much was

those associated with him in the past concerning Mr. Epstein, you consider not continuing communications with

y stated that "the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two year term of state imprisonment." See August 3, 2007 letter from M. Menchel, Exhibit 35.16 This letter openly acknowledged that the Petite Policy applied to this matter, and also highlighted the steps federal prosecutors we

provide notice to the victims. It is also needed to demonstrate why the victims at first received inaccurate information about the NPA, as well as Jeffrey Epstein's involvement in that inaccurate notice. See, e.g., DE 48 at 15-16. 43. RFP No. 16 requests documents regarding Bruce Reinhart, a senior prosecutor w

ch re Travel for Prostitution" containing attorney (Villafafta) handwritten notes regarding grand jury presentation, chart entitled "Brought to Epstein's House" with handwritten notes, Message Pad meta- analysis chart, summary of evidence related to one victim/witness, and relevant grand jury inf

serted Victims' Objections Box #3 Folder entitled "Responses to Arguments Work product No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; P-011923 from JE Counsel" containing: Deliberative process Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Crime-Fraud- Thru ■ 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann 6(e) Misconduct; Not in A

of course, is a defense attorney who represented defendant Epstein. Recording information provided by a defense att

net (617) 338-9538 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 3 EFTA00179621

Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Victims' Objections P-0133303 proposed letter to J. Lefkowitz; 5/22/07 e- mail from A. Lourie to M. Menchel, J. Sloman, A. Marie Villafafta re meeting with G. Lefcourt with attached email from G. Lefcourt re solicitation for meetings Work Product Gover

"Victim Civil Suits" Not privileged. Produced to counsel for Petitioners N/A Box #1 P-003664 Thru P-003678 File folder entitled "Research it JE Websites" containing attorney research Work product Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation;

re Travel for Prostitution" containing attorney (Villafaria) handwritten notes regarding grand jury presentation, chart entitled "Brought to Epstein's House" with handwritten notes, Message Pad meta- analysis chart, summary of evidence related to one victim/witness, and relevant grand jury i

ecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box 3 P-013836 Thru P-013837 Palm Beach Daily News Article, "Attorneys want Jeffrey Epstein Agreement Thrown Out," with attorney's notes written on margin Atty work-product Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty;

recusal of Southern District of Florida, dated July 29, 2011, with attached memorandum from A. Marie Villafafia to Benjamin Greenberg summarizing Jeffrey E stein Investi ation Attorney-Client Privilege Deliberative Process Work Product No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation

Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Victims' Objections P-0133303 proposed letter to J. Lefkowitz; 5/22/07 e- mail from A. Lourie to M. Menchel, J. Sloman, A. Marie Villafafia re meeting with G. Lefcourt with attached email from G. Lefcourt re solicitation for meetings Work Product Gover

(See Tab I), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman provided what purported to be a summary of

fere or restrict the "review process" for either Mr. Epstein or CEOS. I leave it to you and CEOS to figure out

nn Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about cpstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be

g that "the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two-year term of state imprisonment." See Tab 40, August 3, 2007 Email from M. Menchel. Of course, this position is contrary to Section 9-2031D of the U.S. Attorney's Manual (indicating that the "result" of a state prosecution is "pre

Tab 1), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney provided what purported to be a summ of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, false and misleading characterizations and outright falsehoods. The comparison below between the fal

s that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. letter is fraught with inconsistencies, f

g that "the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two-year term of state imprisonment." See Tab 40, August 3, 2007 Email from M. Menchel. Of course, this position is contrary to Section 9-2031D of the U.S. Attorney's Manual (indicating that the "result" of a state prosecution is `pre

uring the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual ina

nds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First A

BMISSION HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012141 --- PAGE BREAK --- KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUBMISSION TO THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Jeffrey Epstein, a successful businessman and noted philanthropist with no prior criminal record, has been investigated for potential violations of

OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Jeffrey Epstein, a successful businessm

OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Jeffrey Epstein, a successful businessma

Menchel advised the defense that the federal government required a minimum term of two years of incarceration. See Tab 40, August 3, 2007 Email from M. Menchel. Subsequently, Ms. 4 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012163 --- PAGE BREAK --- KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Villafana emailed the defense stating that United States Atto