10
Shared Docs
10
Same-Page
12 / 10
Mentions
hich data and procedure are explicitly identical, and there is just one new active data structure in place of the distinction between AtomSpace and MindAgents Where on this continuum does the "mere learning" end and the "real self-modification" start? In this chapter we consider some mechanisms for "adva
ilation 319 schema learning the learning of schemata carrying out cognitive processes in more specialized, context-dependent ways than the general MindAgents do. Eventually, once a CogPrime instance becomes sufficiently complex and advanced, these cognitive schema may replace the MindAgents altogether, l
at contains all required packages and tools to test and develop OpenCog. • Concept Creation: A general term for cognitive processes that create new ConceptNodes, PredicateNodes or concept maps representing new concepts. • Conceptual Blending: A process of creating new concepts via judiciously combining pie
mpilation 319 schema learning the learning of schemata carrying out cognitive processes in more specialized, context-dependent ways than the general MindAgents do. Eventually, once a CogPrime instance becomes sufficiently complex and advanced, these cognitive schema may replace the MindAgents altogether, lea
which data and procedure are explicitly identical, and there is just one new active data structure in place of the distinction between AtomSpace and MindAgents Where on this continuum does the "mere learning" end and the "real self-modification" start? In this chapter we consider some mechanisms for "advan
hat contains all required packages and tools to test and develop OpenCog. e Concept Creation: A general term for cognitive processes that create new ConceptNodes, PredicateNodes or concept maps representing new concepts. e Conceptual Blending: A process of creating new concepts via judiciously combining piece
Agent migration, and machines joining or leaving the CogPrime cluster. So, at the Unit level, attention allocation in CogPrime has two aspects: how MindAgents and Tasks receive attention from CogPrime, and how Atoms receive attention from different MindAgents and Tasks. The topic of this Section is the fo
han using a Handle based notation which Atoms would be referred to as 1, 3433322, etc.; but sometimes we will use the Handle notation as well. Some ConceptNodes and conceptual PredicateNode or Schemallodes may correspond with human-language words or phrases like cat, bite, and so forth. This will be the mino
idual cognitive processes. The CogPrime design gravitates more toward the latter approach. though also with some specific mechanisms within various MindAgents; and efforts have been made to have these specific mechanisms modulated by the generic attention allocation structures and dynamics wherever possibl
MemberLinks. This is in accordance with the notion of glocal memory, in the language of which the HPAN attractors are the maps and the corresponding ConceptNodes are the keys. Put simply, when a HPAN attractor is recognized, MemberLinks are created between the HPAN nodes comprising the main body of the attra
to Atoms with more impor- tance, and hence creates an evolutionary, dynamic with importance as the fitness criterion and the whole constellation of MindAgents as the novelty-generation mechanism. However, MOSES explicitly embodies evolutionary dynamics for the learning of new patterns and procedures that
usual, but making use of Metallodes as well as ordinary CT nodes. The modeling of Metallodes is quite similar to the modeling of Nodes representing ConceptNodes and PredicateNodes using embedding vectors. In this way, one can use standard, small decision tree models to model fairly large portions of CTs (be
links that could simply be found by the pattern matcher when trying to find variable assignments to satisfy (El, E2, E3, E4}. 36.4.1 Breakdown into MindAgents To make this sort of PLN dynamic work, we require a number of MindAgents to be operating "ambiently" in the background whenever inference is occurr
y, there may be patterns across large numbers of nodes that merit encapsulation in individual nodes. For instance, if there are 1000 fairly similar ConceptNodes, it may be better not to merge them all together, but rather to create a single node to which they all link, reifying the category that they collect
sambigua- tion that needs to be done to get the structure of the resultant Atom-set correct. Any further disambiguation is left to be done later, by MindAgents acting on the Atom-sets after they've already been placed in the AtomSpace. • In the old approach, the RelEx2Frame rules attempted, in many cases,
s of word sense creation. Suppose we have a WordNode W that has ReferenceLinks to a number of different Con- ceptNodes. A common case is that these ConceptNodes fall into clusters, each one denoting a "sense" of the word. The clusters are defined by the following relationships: 1. ConceptNodes within a clus
d effort management frameworks attempt to enforce this, via minimizing the amount of effort spent by the system in getting to a certain conclusion. MindAgents operating primarily on one kind of knowledge (e.g. MOSES, PLN) may for a time seek to follow the shortest paths within their particular correspondin
at contains all required packages and tools to test and develop OpenCog. • Concept Creation: A general term for cognitive processes that create new ConceptNodes, PredicateNodes or concept maps representing new concepts. • Conceptual Blending: A process of creating new concepts via judiciously combining pie
gh STI., which rapidly decreases in meet cases local workspaces bubbles of interlinked Atoms with moderate impor- tance, focused on by a subset of MindAgents (defined in Chapter 19 of Part 2) for a period of time perceptual associative memory HebbianLinks in the AT sensory memory spaceserver/timeserve
Knowledge in the Atomspace. A simple example of implicit knowledge in the Atomspace. The "chicken" and "food" concepts are represented by "maps" of ConceptNodes interconnected by HebbianLinks, where the latter tend to form between Con- ceptNodes that are often simultaneously important. The bundle of links bet
high STI, which rapidly decreases in most cases ocal workspaces bubbles of interlinked Atoms with moderate impor- ance, focused on by a subset of MindAgents (defined in Chapter 19 of Part 2) for a period of time perceptual associative memory |HebbianLinks in the AT sensory memory spaceserver /timeserver
t Knowledge in the Atomspace. A simple example of implicit knowledge in the Atomspace. The "chicken" and "food" concepts are represented by "maps" of ConceptNodes interconnected by HebbianLinks, where the latter tend to form between Con- ceptNodes that are often simultaneously important. The bundle of links bet
Entities connected to both MindAgents and ConceptNodes
OpenCog
ORGANIZATION
Marc Rich
PERSONCogPrime
ORGANIZATIONDeSTIN
ORGANIZATIONImplicationLinks
ORGANIZATIONTruthValues
ORGANIZATIONPredicateNodes
ORGANIZATIONPredicateNode
LOCATION
Marvin Minsky
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONSTICurrency
LOCATION
Dorner
ORGANIZATIONCombo
LOCATION
Python
ORGANIZATIONSchemallode
PERSONPetBrain
ORGANIZATIONthe Webmind AI Engine
ORGANIZATIONOpenCog Atomspace
ORGANIZATIONthe Procedure Repository
ORGANIZATION
Joscha Bach
PERSON