Epstein Secrets

pressly." United States States v. Monzel, 641 F.3d 528, 542 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, No. 11-85, S. Ct. 2011 WL 3055311 (Nov. 28, 2011) (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald v. Southern Fann Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, 'in the absence of strong indicia of contrary cong

pressly." United States States v. Monzel, 641 F.3d 528, 542 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, No. 11-85, S. Ct. 2011 WL 3055311 (Nov. 28, 2011) (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald v. Southern Fann Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, 'in the absence of strong indicia of contrary cong

pressly." United States States v. Monzel, 641 F.3d 528, 542 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, No. 11-85, S. Ct. 2011 WL 3055311 (Nov. 28, 2011) (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the

legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies."); McDonald v. Southern Fann Bureau Life Ins. Co., 291 F.3d 718, 725 (11th Cir. 2002) ("When Congress creates certain remedial procedures, we are, `in the absence of strong indicia of contrary cong