Epstein Secrets

Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: NONPARTY M.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS FILED BY W. BERGER 29 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Filing Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: (NTERVENER'S) MOTION TO ST

sure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: JEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: NONPARTY E.W.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS FILED BY W. BERGER 75 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Filing Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: (NTERVENER'S) MOTION TO ST

sure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum. 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

te: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: NONPARTY E.W.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS FILED BY W. BERGER 29 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Filing Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: Disposition Amount: Docket Text: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E (NTERVENER'S) MOTION TO ST

ith be argued that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in determining that no such privacy interest was implicated. 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Ha. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA.1° Nor did the trial court's rejection o