Epstein Secrets

COSTS FILED BY W. BERGER 29 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Filing Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: (NTERVENER'S) MOTION TO STAY AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW. FILED BY S. KUVIN, ESQ 30 EXLT - EXHIBIT LIST Filing Date: 08-JUL-2009 Filing Party: EPSTE

sure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

COSTS FILED BY W. BERGER 75 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Filing Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: (NTERVENER'S) MOTION TO STAY AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW. FILED BY S. KUVIN, ESQ 76 EXLT - EXHIBIT LIST Filing Date: 08-JUL-2009 Filing Party: IEPST

sure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum. 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

COSTS FILED BY W. BERGER 29 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Filing Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: Disposition Amount: Docket Text: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E (NTERVENER'S) MOTION TO STAY AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW. FILED BY S. KUVIN, ESQ 30 EXLT - EXHIBIT LIST Filing Date: 08-JUL-2009 Filing Party: EPSTE

ith be argued that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in determining that no such privacy interest was implicated. 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Ha. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA.1° Nor did the trial court's rejection o