Epstein Secrets

re 16 or 17 year olds, there was no use of the Internet to lure young victims, and no danger presented by Internet predation. 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) — No Travel For The Purpose of Engaging In Illicit Sexual Conduct, As Required By The Statute The linchpin of a prosecution under § 2423(b) is "travel for the purpose ofengaging in . . . illicit se

that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of thcir true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted f

e 16 or I 7 year olds, there was no use of the Internet to lure young victims, and no danger presented by Internet predation. 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) — No Travel For The Purpose of Engaging In Illicit Sexual Conduct, As Required By The Statute The linchpin of a prosecution under § 2423(b) is "travel for the purpose of engaging in . . . illicit s

that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as being 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Robson Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Laduke Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was

re 16 or 17 year olds, there was no use of the Internet to lure young victims, and no danger presented by Internet predation. 18 U.S.C. § 2423(6) — No Travel For The Purpose of Engaging In Illicit Sexual Conduct, As Required By The Statute The linchpin of a prosecution under § 2423(b) is "travel for the purpose of engaging in . . . illicit s

g that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Ein i was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted from th