Epstein Secrets

that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t

ecruited Jane Doe #17 and a non-minor female to go to Epstein's home. There are ap roximatel 60 calls between Jane Doe #16 and and 14 calls between Jane Doe #16 and called Jane Doe #16 once. Credibility Issues Jane Doe #16 is the basis for one count of the state indictment. Epstein's at-tome s have acc

that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t

Jane Doe #5 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida. 3. On or about March 12, 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $200 to Jane Doe #5. 2. The Substantive Offenses related to Jane Doe #5 Count Date(s) Offense Statute Defendant(s) 5 3/7/04 - 3/11/04 Use of cellular phone to

fighting at school because the other girl accused Jane Doe #2 of being a prostitute, one of the school principals intervened. The principal searched Jane Doe #2's purse and found $300 cash. The principal asked Jane Doe #2 where the money came from. Jane Doe #2 initially claimed that she earned the money w

that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t