4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury, the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the d
Page: EFTA02857524_p11 →legislature's authority to define an offense includes the power `to exclude elements of knowledge and diligence from its definition."' Id. (quoting Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 225, 228 (1957)). The Tenth Circuit also agreed with the legislative history, finding that the statute "protects children from sexual abus
Page: EFTA02857524_p88 →legislature's authority to define an offense includes the power `to exclude elements of knowledge and diligence from its definition.'" Id. (quoting Lambert v. California , 355 U.S. 225, 228 (1957)). The Tenth Circuit also agreed with the legislative history, finding that the statute "protects children from sexual ab
Page: EFTA02857732_p5 →unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the
Page: EFTA02857732_p6 →legislature's authority to define an offense includes the power `to exclude elements of knowledge and diligence from its definition.'" Id. (quoting Lambert v. California , 355 U.S. 225, 228 (1957)). The Tenth Circuit also agreed with the legislative history, finding that the statute "protects children from sexual ab
Page: EFTA02857763_p5 →unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the
Page: EFTA02857763_p6 →legislature's authority to define an offense includes the power `to exclude elements of knowledge and diligence from its definition.'" Id. (quoting Lambert v. California , 355 U.S. 225, 228 (1957)). The Tenth Circuit also agreed with the legislative history, finding that the statute "protects children from sexual ab
Page: EFTA02857810_p5 →unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the
Page: EFTA02857810_p6 →Entities connected to both Drury and Lambert v. California

Naomi Campbell
PERSONCriminal Division
ORGANIZATION
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Robert Maxwell
PERSONVoiceStream
ORGANIZATION
Jencks
PERSON
Cleveland
LOCATIONEllis
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONthe Sentencing Commission
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSONNorthern Region
LOCATIONGarcia-Lopez
PERSONJanusz Banasiak
PERSON
Jacksonville
LOCATION
Philadelphia
LOCATIONMAUSA
ORGANIZATIONCourtney Wild
PERSONMeacham
PERSON