Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ver agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Eleven
8-39 (citing United States I. Griffith, 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States, Taylor, 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States I Scisum, 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States Hamilton, 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Governmen
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857732_p3
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
Page: EFTA02857732_p3 →Page EFTA02857732_p6
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
Page: EFTA02857732_p6 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857763_p3
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
Page: EFTA02857763_p3 →Page EFTA02857763_p6
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
Page: EFTA02857763_p6 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p3
(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove
Page: EFTA02857810_p3 →Page EFTA02857810_p6
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
Page: EFTA02857810_p6 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (148)
Entities connected to both VoiceStream and Scisum
United States
LOCATION9 w/ VoiceStream·7 w/ Scisum
LB
Leon Black
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·7 w/ Scisum
Naomi Campbell
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·7 w/ Scisum
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·7 w/ Scisum
MAUSA
ORGANIZATION9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Strevell
ORGANIZATION9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Offense Instr
ORGANIZATION9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
RB
Roy Black
PERSON8 w/ VoiceStream·7 w/ Scisum
Northern Region
LOCATION9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
DR
Drury
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
GA
Garcia-Lopez
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Alexander Acosta
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Robert Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
JB
Janusz Banasiak
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Philadelphia
LOCATION9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Marc Rich
PERSON8 w/ VoiceStream·7 w/ Scisum
CW
Courtney Wild
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Mortensen
PERSON9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum
Jacksonville
LOCATION9 w/ VoiceStream·6 w/ Scisum