Epstein Secrets

ission on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information W.D. Mo. U.S. v. Hicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage in sex act. Defendant claimed no violation o

d. 2422(6); 2423; 1956 No Information ***Conspiracy/ Pimps 74 EFTA00079487 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE N.D. Ohio Chilleme v. U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicatin

Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage t in sex ac. 2422(b); 2423(b) Sting 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Not Consummated Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is gra

ial denied. No Information ***Conspiracy/ Pimps 77 EFTA00224211 COURT aCAS -. .. . lit FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE N.D. Ohio Chilleme I U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicating

ssion on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(6) No Information W.D. Mo. U.S. v. Flicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage in sex act. Defendant claimed no violation o

FTA01729558 COURT ' - ‘.,-: ' CAS ,7,-...k.. „ .1y- " • .., • _%.-L,..,--- • :.FAOIL .2 •MO A, :.1trCFStc 1.4,11,O4 • , "..; N.D. Ohio Chilleme v. U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicatin