Epstein Secrets

tment? 20 A This all pertains to the D-3 investment. Yes, 21 sir. 22 Q And just to start at the beginning of the 23 e-mail, first it's from Frank Spinosa. Do you see that 24 at bottom of the second page, 46168? 25 A I do. a fraud. So say it was authorized during the course of the fraud, yes. Q

Q And the other one was D-3 Capital? 4 A I recall that as well. S Q Do you recall that Razorback was sort of a next 6 generation version of the Banyon Income Fund that 7 Bekkedam had brought Von Allmen into? 8 A I don't recall. 9 Q That basically Razorback was lending -- that 10 A.J.'s group lent mone

tment? 20 A This all pertains to the D-3 investment. Yes, 21 sir. 22 Q And just to start at the beginning of the 23 e-mail, first it's from Frank Spinosa. Do you see that 24 at bottom of the second page, 46168? 25 A I do. strange to me because they were signing fake documents in a fraud. So say

Q And the other one was D-3 Capital? 4 A I recall that as well. 5 Q Do you recall that Razorback was sort of a next 6 generation version of the Banyon Income Fund that 7 Bekkedam had brought Von Allmen into? 8 A I don't recall. 9 Q That basically Razorback was lending -- that 10 A.J.'s group lent mone

3, 2009 $1,000,000.00 j. September 25, 2009 $1,000,000.00 k. October 8, 2009 $900,000.00 253. On August 25, 2009, Rothstein sent a letter to Frank Spinosa at TD Bank instructing him that the funds in a specified trust account should only be distributed to Sochet Trust. 254. On September 17, 2009, So

eld was: (1) the personal tax accountants for Rothstein and Stuart Rosenfeldt; (2) the tax accountants for RRA; and (3) the independent auditors for the Banyon Income Fund, L.P. and, as such, uniquely positioned to discover the pervasive fraud. Notwithstanding, Berenfeld either intentionally, recklessly, or with gross