Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ively by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the USAO would not be entitled to compel pm-trial production of any of this information. See Fed. R. Cr. P. 16(bX1)(A), (C), and 16(bX2); United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1355-56 (11th Cir. 1991) (explaining act-of-production privilege). Th
ed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and S.D. Fla. Local Rule 26.1, Epstein "must" disclose the identities of all the witnesses he would call in his defense to the Federal Criminal Action (Rule 26(aXI XAXi)), copies of "all documents" he "may use to support [his] defenses" (Rule 26(aX1XA)(ii)), as well as the identity of "any" expert witness he "
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ively by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the USAO would not be entitled to compel pm-trial production of any of this information. See Fed. R. Cr. P. 16(bX1)(A), (C), and 16(bX2); United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1355-56 (11th Cir. 1991) (explaining act-of-production privilege). Th
ed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and S.D. Fla. Local Rule 26.1, Epstein "must" disclose the identities of all the witnesses he would call in his defense to the Federal Criminal Action (Rule 26(aXI XAXi)), copies of "all documents" he "may use to support [his] defenses" (Rule 26(aX1XA)(ii)), as well as the identity of "any" expert witness he "
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ively by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the USAO would not be entitled to compel pm-trial production of any of this information. See Fed. R. Cr. P. 16(bX1)(A), (C), and 16(bX2); United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1355-56 (11th Cir. 1991) (explaining act-of-production privilege). Th
ed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and S.D. Fla. Local Rule 26.1, Epstein "must" disclose the identities of all the witnesses he would call in his defense to the Federal Criminal Action (Rule 26(aXI XAXi)), copies of "all documents" he "may use to support [his] defenses" (Rule 26(aX1XA)(ii)), as well as the identity of "any" expert witness he "
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ively by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the USAO would not be entitled to compel pm-trial production of any of this information. See Fed. R. Cr. P. 16(bX1)(A), (C), and 16(bX2); United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1355-56 (11th Cir. 1991) (explaining act-of-production privilege). Th
ed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and S.D. Fla. Local Rule 26.1, Epstein "must" disclose the identities of all the witnesses he would call in his defense to the Federal Criminal Action (Rule 26(aXI XAXi)), copies of "all documents" he "may use to support [his] defenses" (Rule 26(aX1XA)(ii)), as well as the identity of "any" expert witness he "
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (46)
Entities connected to both R. Cr and the Federal Criminal Action (Rule 26(aXI
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON11 w/ R.·4 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
Michael Douglas
PERSON9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
Civil Lawsuits
ORGANIZATION9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
H.R.
PERSON9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
the Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
Athens
LOCATION9 w/ R.·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON8 w/ R.·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION8 w/ R.·4 w/ the
Coconut Grove
LOCATION8 w/ R.·4 w/ the
TR
Treadway
PERSON7 w/ R.·4 w/ the
E.D. Pa. 1980
ORGANIZATION7 w/ R.·4 w/ the