Epstein Secrets

statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide

by one of Defendant's agents to give Defendant a massage for compensation," and that Defendant's agent "drove [Plaintiff] to [Defendant's] mansion." FAC S 18. After she allegedly was led to the massage room, the FAC alleges that a topless woman "with dark hair [and] an accent ... tried to coax Plaintiff

statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide

by one of Defendant's agents to give Defendant a massage for compensation," and that Defendant's agent "drove [Plaintiff] to [Defendant's] mansion." FAC S 18. After she allegedly was led to the massage room, the FAC alleges that a topless woman "with dark hair [and] an accent ... tried to coax Plaintiff

statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide

by one of Defendant's agents to give Defendant a massage for compensation," and that Defendant's agent "drove [Plaintiff] to [Defendant's] mansion." FAC S 18. After she allegedly was led to the massage room, the FAC alleges that a topless woman "with dark hair [and] an accent ... tried to coax Plaintiff

statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide

by one of Defendant's agents to give Defendant a massage for compensation," and that Defendant's agent "drove [Plaintiff] to [Defendant's] mansion." FAC S 18. After she allegedly was led to the massage room, the FAC alleges that a topless woman "with dark hair [and] an accent ... tried to coax Plaintiff

statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide

by one of Defendant's agents to give Defendant a massage for compensation," and that Defendant's agent "drove [Plaintiff] to [Defendant's] mansion." FAC S 18. After she allegedly was led to the massage room, the FAC alleges that a topless woman "with dark hair [and] an accent ... tried to coax Plaintiff