Epstein Secrets

(JUDGE COLBATH) THAT THE RECORDS ARE DENIED. THE GRANTED. THE MOTION TO UNSEAL GRANTED. MOTIONS TO SEAL THE COURT MOTIONS TO INTERVENE ARE THE DOCUMENTS IS 23 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Filing Date: 29-JUN-2009 'Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: MOTION TO STAY AND SUP

ify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA 21 CONCLUSION

Docket Text: (JUDGE COLBATH) THAT THE MOTIONS TO SEAL THE COURT RECORDS ARE DENIED. THE MOTIONS TO INTERVENE ARE GRANTED. THE MOTION TO UNSEAL THE DOCUMENTS IS GRANTED. I_7=1 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Filing Date: 29-JUN-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: MOTION TO

tify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA 21 CONCLUSION

Docket Text: (JUDGE COLBATH) THAT THE MOTIONS TO SEAL THE COURT RECORDS ARE DENIED. THE MOTIONS TO INTERVENE ARE GRANTED. THE MOTION TO UNSEAL THE DOCUMENTS IS GRANTED. 23 Filing Date: ... ...._. 29-JUN-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: MOTION TO STAY AND SUP

n determining that no such privacy interest was implicated. 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Ha. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA.1° Nor did the trial court's rejection of Petitioner's comity argument depart from the essential requirements of law. In t