Epstein Secrets

4 (1946) (even though the Act includes some non-commercial cases within its scope, its primary focus is commercial sexual activity); United States v Jamerson, 60 F Supp 281 (D.C. Iowa 1944). However, it has also served to protect women against conduct, whether commercial or not, that involves transportat

h Mr. Epstein purportedly engaged. We address each statute in turn, starting with those regulating monetary transactions. 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(3) - The Money Laundering Statute - Does Not Apply to Mr. Epstein's Alleged Misconduct No reasonable reading of the money laundering statute can countenance such a charge against Mr. Epst

4 (1946) (even though the Act includes some non-commercial cases within its scope, its primary focus is commercial sexual activity); United States v Jamerson, 60 F Supp 281 (D.C. Iowa 1944). However, it has also served to protect women against conduct, whether commercial or not, that involves transportat

h Mr. Epstein purportedly engaged. We address each statute in turn, starting with those regulating monetary transactions. 18 U.S-C. § 1956(a)(3) - The Money Laundering Statute - Does Not Apply to Mr. Epstein's Alleged Misconduct No reasonable reading of the money laundering statute can countenance such a charge against Mr. Epst

eland United States, 329 U.S. 14 (1946) (even though the Act includes some non-commercial ekses focus is commercial sexual activity); United States Jamerson, 60i I s within its scope, its primary Supp 281 (D.C. Iowa 1944). However, it has also served to protect women agai t conduct, commercial whethv

ch Mr. Epstein purportedly engaged. We address each statute in turn, starting with those regulating monetary transactions. 18 U.S.C. § 1956(aX3) - The Money Laundering Statute - Does Not Apply to Mr. Epstein's Alleged Misconduct No reasonable reading of the money laundering statute can countenance such a charge against Mr. Epst