Epstein Secrets

any voluntarily prepared records, including personal ones"); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 759 F.2d 1418, 1419 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Bedell & Co. , 2006 WL 3813792, ■1 (E.D.N.Y Oct. 30, 2006) ("It is well settled that the Fifth Amendment `does not protect the contents of voluntarily prepared d

ers that are the subject of this motion, but Epstein had already removed the computers from the home. ( See Recarey Declaration.) FlAs explained in the Ex Parte Affidavits, the United States has established that it can authenticate the computers without Riley's testimony. Even if it could not, however, that is not a ba

f any voluntarily prepared records, including personal ones"); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 759 F.2d 1418, 1419 (9th Cir. 1985); United States I Bedell & Co. , 2006 WL 3813792, ■1 (E.D.N.Y Oct. 30, 2006) ("It is well settled that the Fifth Amendment `does not protect the contents of voluntarily prepared d

ers that are the subject of this motion, but Epstein had already removed the computers from the home. ( See Recarey Declaration.) FlAs explained in the Ex Parte Affidavits, the United States has established that it can authenticate the computers without Riley's testimony. Even if it could not, however, that is not a ba

of any voluntarily prepared records, including personal ones"); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 759 F.2d 1418, 1419 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Bedell & Co., 2006 WL 3813792, *1 (E.D.N.Y Oct. 30, 2006) ("It is well settled that the Fifth Amendment 'does not protect the contents of voluntarily prepared d

rposes of Doe, and, thus, the subpoenas are enforceable (regardless of the computers' contents). Id. at 93-94 (citation omitted)." "As explained in the Ex Parte Affidavits, the United States has established that it can authenticate the computers without Riley's testimony. Even if it could not, however, that is not a b