Epstein Secrets

Grand Jury subpoena? Id. at 194-95, 196. In reaching its decision, the Seventh Circuit relied on In re Feldberg , 862 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1988). In Feldberg , an attorney was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury after the grand jury suspected obstruction of justice based upon the delayed disclosure

o convey them to the government pursuant to Grand Jury subpoena? Id. at 194-95, 196. In reaching its decision, the Seventh Circuit relied on In re Feldberg , 862 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1988). In Feldberg , an attorney was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury after the grand jury suspected obstruction

ial entity, not a natural person, and therefore has no Fifth Amendment privilege at all. See, e.g., Doe v. United States , 487 U.S. 201, 206 (1988); Bellis v. United States , 417 U.S. 85, 90 (1974). B. The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work Product Doctrine Also Do Not Bar the Production of the Com

Grand Jury subpoena? Id. at 194-95, 196. In reaching its decision, the Seventh Circuit relied on In re Feldberg , 862 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1988). In Feldberg , an attorney was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury after the grand jury suspected obstruction of justice based upon the delayed disclosure

o convey them to the government pursuant to Grand Jury subpoena? Id. at 194-95, 196. In reaching its decision, the Seventh Circuit relied on In re Feldberg , 862 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1988). In Feldberg , an attorney was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury after the grand jury suspected obstruction

cial entity, not a natural person, and therefore has no Fifth Amendment privilege at all. See, e.g., Doe I United States , 487 U.S. 201, 206 (1988); Bellis I United States , 417 U.S. 85, 90 (1974). B. The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work Product Doctrine Also Do Not Bar the Production of the Comp

government pursuant to Grand Jury subpoena? -31- EFTA00179130 Id. at 194-95, 196. In reaching its decision, the Seventh Circuit relied on In re Feldberg, 862 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1988). In Feldberg, an attorney was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury after the grand jury suspected obstruction o

? -31- EFTA00179130 Id. at 194-95, 196. In reaching its decision, the Seventh Circuit relied on In re Feldberg, 862 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1988). In Feldberg, an attorney was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury after the grand jury suspected obstruction of justice based upon the delayed disclosure

cial entity, not a natural person, and therefore has no Fifth Amendment privilege at all. See, e.g., Doe v. United States, 487 U.S. 201, 206 (1988); Bellis v. United States, 417 U.S. 85, 90 (1974). -15- EFTA00179114 B. The Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work Product Doctrine Also Do Not Bar the