Epstein Secrets

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 1 I: IS. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and no

y Company, by its co-manager, Scott W. Rothstein; (Bt2) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in QTask; (BD) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; (BM) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; (BI5) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucina; (B16) Scott W. Rothstein

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds arc hereby frozen and not

ed Liability Company, by its co-manager, Scott W. Rothstein; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in QTask; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucina; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interes

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11; 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not

Company, by its co-manager, Scott W. Rothstein; (BI2) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in QTask; (313) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; (B14) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; (B15) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucina; (BI6) Scott W. Rothstei