the Child Exploitation
ORGANIZATIONResponse and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
ORGANIZATION3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
t. First, he raised challenges to the United States Attorney's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. See Exs. G, K, L. Indeed, from late 2007 to May 2008, Eps
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
t. First, he raised challenges to the United States Attorney's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. See Exs. G, K, L. Indeed, from late 2007 to May 2008, Eps
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
t. First, he raised challenges to the United States Attorney's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. See Exs. G, K, L. Indeed, from late 2007 to May 2008, Eps
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
Entities connected to both the Child Exploitation and Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Dexter Lee
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Alice Fisher
PERSONKuyrkendall
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON
Executive
ORGANIZATION
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON