Epstein Secrets

y in order to prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases and to avoid congestion in the calendars of the District Court." Id. , citing Durham I. Fla. East Coast Ry. Co. , 385 F.2d 366, 367 (5 th Cir. 1967). The instant case was filed as an emergency matter on July 7, 2008. Within two days, the gov

of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit

y in order to prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases and to avoid congestion in the calendars of the District Court." Id. , citing Durham I. Fla. East Coast Ry. Co. , 385 F.2d 366, 367 (5 th Cir. 1967). The instant case was filed as an emergency matter on July 7, 2008. Within two days, the gov

of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit

y in order to prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases and to avoid congestion in the calendars of the District Court." Id. , citing Durham I. Fla. East Coast Ry. Co. , 385 F.2d 366, 367 (5 th Cir. 1967). The instant case was filed as an emergency matter on July 7, 2008. Within two days, the gov

of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit