Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (22)
Entities connected to both Justice Department Complaint and the Internal Justice Department
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON17 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON17 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON17 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON17 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
SR
Scott Rothstein
PERSON8 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
CH
Chambers
PERSON7 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
the State Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
JN
JANE DOE NO
PERSON5 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
D.E.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
CH
Chmielarz
PERSON5 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
the Florida Rules of Evidence
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
the Final Judgment
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
See American Disability Assn.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Justice·5 w/ the
LINNEA
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Justice·3 w/ the
ER
Epstein I. Rothstein
PERSON3 w/ Justice·3 w/ the
RJ
R. JOHN
PERSON3 w/ Justice·3 w/ the
internal Justice Department Proceeding
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Justice·3 w/ the