Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tims of a crime veto power over any prosecutorial decision, strategy or tactic regarding bail, release, plea, sentencing or parole.") (citing In re W.R. Huff, 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005) ("Nothing in the CVRA requires the Government to seek approval from crime victims before negotiating or entering i
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tims of a crime veto power over any prosecutorial decision, strategy or tactic regarding bail, release, plea, sentencing or parole.") (citing In re W.R. Huff, 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005) ("Nothing in the CVRA requires the Government to seek approval from crime victims before negotiating or entering i
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tims of a crime veto power over any prosecutorial decision, strategy or tactic regarding bail, release, plea, sentencing or parole.") (citing In re W.R. Huff, 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005) ("Nothing in the CVRA requires the Government to seek approval from crime victims before negotiating or entering i
y, rescission of an agreement is a remedy reserved to the parties to that agreement or those in contractual privity with them. See, e.g., 77tompkins v. Lir Joe Records, Inc., 476 F.3d 1294, 1315 (11th Cir. 2007) (holding that "the first requirement of a suit for rescission under Florida law" is "that the parties t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both W.R. Huff and v. Lir Joe Records
United States
LOCATION12 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
Paul Cassell
PERSON11 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON11 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON11 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
RU
Rubin
PERSON11 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
AG
Aguirre-Gonzalez
PERSON10 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON10 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON10 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
the Southern District
LOCATION10 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON9 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION7 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON7 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
Marc Rich
PERSON7 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
GA
Garcia
PERSON7 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
Kenna
PERSON7 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
WA
Walker
PERSON7 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
MC
Medmarc Cas
PERSON6 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
Michael Douglas
PERSON6 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION6 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.
R.R. Passengers
ORGANIZATION6 w/ W.R.·3 w/ v.