4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
he attorney's subjective intentions, the conduct was unreasonable and vexatious when measured against an objective standard." Hudson v. Int 1 Comp. Negotiations, Inc., 499 F.3d 1252, 1262 (11th Cir. 2007). 3 EFTA00205046 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 5 of 31 DISC
articular matters resulting from the agency's determination that such contract is divisible. Example 8 to paragraph (h)(5): An agency contracts with Company A to install a satellite system connecting the headquarters office to each of its twenty field offices. Although the field offices are located at vari
he attorney's subjective intentions, the conduct was unreasonable and vexatious when measured against an objective standard." Hudson v. Int 1 Comp. Negotiations, Inc., 499 F.3d 1252, 1262 (11th Cir. 2007). 3 EFTA00205077 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 5 of 31 DISC
articular matters resulting from the agency's determination that such contract is divisible. Example 8 to paragraph (h)(5): An agency contracts with Company A to install a satellite system connecting the headquarters office to each of its twenty field offices. Although the field offices are located at vari
he attorney's subjective intentions, the conduct was unreasonable and vexatious when measured against an objective standard." Hudson v. Int'l Comp. Negotiations, Inc., 499 F.3d 1252, 1262 (11th Cir. 2007). 3 EFTA00230040 v , Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 5 of 31
articular matters resulting from the agency's determination that such contract is divisible. Example 8 to paragraph (h)(5): An agency contracts with Company A to install a satellite system connecting the headquarters office to each of its twenty field offices. Although the field offices ere located at vari
the attorney's subjective intentions, the conduct was unreasonable and vexatious when measured against an objective standard." Hudson.. Intl Comp. Negotiations, Inc., 499 F.3d 1252, 1262 (11th Cir. 2007). 3 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000794 EFTA00230618 v , Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docke
articular matters resulting from the agency's determination that such contract is divisible. Example 8 to paragraph (h)(5): An agency contracts with Company A to install a satellite system connecting the headquarters office to each of its twenty field offices. Although the field offices ere located at vari
Entities connected to both Negotiations, Inc. and Company A

Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONA.G.
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSONINTERVENOR
ORGANIZATION
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONU.S. Customs
ORGANIZATIONthe Palm Beach County Commission
ORGANIZATIONthe Federal Bar Association
ORGANIZATIONNorma L. Shapiro
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONMeritorious Acts and Service
ORGANIZATIONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATIONthe Public Integrity Section
ORGANIZATION
Kaplan
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONEnforcement's Award for Exceptional Service
ORGANIZATIONthe West Palm Beach Office
ORGANIZATION
United States Department of the Treasury
ORGANIZATION