4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
asonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251, 1255 (11th Cir. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were fact
the ensuing administrative or judicial proceedings against the company. Example 2 to paragraph (h)(4): A former special Government employee (SGE) of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research served, before leaving the agency, on a "peer review" committee that made a recommendation to the agency concerning the technical meri
asonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251, 1255 (11th Cir. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were fact
the ensuing administrative or judicial proceedings against the company. Example 2 to paragraph (h)(4): A former special Government employee (SGE) of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research served, before leaving the agency, on a "peer review" committee that made a recommendation to the agency concerning the technical meri
easonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan v. Dainderarysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251, .1255 (11th Cir. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable • attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were
die ensuing administrative or judicial proceedings against the company. Example 2 to paragraph (hX4): A former special Government employee (SOB) of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research served, before leaving the agency, on a "peer review" committee that made a recommendation to the agency concerning the technical meri
asonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan ! DaintlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251, .1255 (11th Cir. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable • attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were
die ensuing administrative or judicial proceedings against the company. Example 2 to paragraph (hX4): A former special Government employee (SOB) of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research served, before leaving the agency, on a "peer review" committee that made a recommendation to the agency concerning the technical meri
Entities connected to both A.G. and the Agency for Health Care Policy

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATIONNegotiations, Inc.
ORGANIZATIONFBI
ORGANIZATIONINTERVENOR
ORGANIZATION
Kaplan
PERSONthe West Palm Beach Office
ORGANIZATION
United States Department of the Treasury
ORGANIZATIONU.S. Customs
ORGANIZATIONthe Palm Beach County Commission
ORGANIZATIONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONNorma L. Shapiro
PERSON
Joi Ito
PERSONthe Federal Bar Association
ORGANIZATION