Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(DE 260). II. Discussion District courts have "broad discretion in shaping the scope of discovery under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)." Williams I. City of Dothan, 745 F.2d 1406, 1415 (11th Cir. 1984). The Court will first address matters related to whether a privilege protects the submitted documents from di
65 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. a at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n (DE 260). IL Discussion District courts have "broad discretion in shaping the scope of discovery under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)." Williams v. City of Dothan, 745 F.2d 1406, 1415 (11th Cir. 1984). The Court will first address matters related to whether a privilege protects the submitted documents from di
5 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. (1 at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n (DE 260). H. Discussion District courts have "broad discretion in shaping the scope of discovery under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)." Williams v. City of Dothan, 745 F.2d 1406, 1415 (11th Cir. 1984). The Court will first address matters related to whether a privilege protects the submitted documents from di
at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. (a. at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(DE 260). II. Discussion District courts have "broad discretion in shaping the scope of discovery under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)." Williams v. City of Dothan, 745 F.2d 1406, 1415 (11th Cir. 1984). The Court will first address matters related to whether a privilege protects the submitted documents from di
65 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. a at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (61)
Entities connected to both Dothan and The Courts
George W. Bush
PERSON17 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON16 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Michael Jackson
PERSON11 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON11 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
United States
LOCATION9 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Kenneth Marra
PERSON7 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
the Southern District
LOCATION7 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
WA
Wayte
PERSON5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Table
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Main Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
ST
Subpoena Duces Tecum
PERSON5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
HI
Hickman
PERSON5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
RR
Richard M. Rosenbaum
PERSON5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Atlanta Gas Light Co.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
the United States Attorneys
LOCATION5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Michael Douglas
PERSON5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Town of Newton
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The
Federal Trade Communication
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Dothan·4 w/ The