Back to Network
10
Shared Docs
10
Same-Page
10 / 10
Mentions
Document Mentions (10 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
in complete agreement with the known > > facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous > > effects discovered by Hubel and Wiesel, but not explained by them. > > Besides these results (1), (2), (3) which were original (and in part > > even shocking) because of the unusual dire
etween number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mammals in complete agreement with the known facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous effects discovered by Hubel and Wiesel, but not explained by them. Besides these results (1), (2), (3) which were original (and in part even shocking) because of the unusual direct transl
lations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work', I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mammals in complete agreement with the known facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous effects discovered by Hubel and Wiesel, but not explained by them. Besides these results (1), (2), (3) which were original (and in part even shocking) because of the unusual direct trans
lations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
in complete agreement with the known > > facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous > > effects discovered by Hubel and Wiesel, but not explained by them. > > Besides these results (1), (2), (3) which were original (and in part > > even shocking) because of the unusual dire
etween number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory mak
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mammals in complete agreement with the known facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous effects discovered by Hubei and Wiesel, but not explained by them. Besides these results (1), (2), (3) which were original (and in part even shocking) because of the unusual direct trans
ations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mammals in complete agreement with the known facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous effects discovered by Hubel and Wiesel, but not explained by them. Besides these results (1), (2), (3) which were original (and in part even shocking) because of the unusual direct trans
ations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mammals in complete agreement with the known facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous effects discovered by Hubei and Wiesel, but not explained by them. Besides these results (1), (2), (3) which were original (and in part even shocking) because of the unusual direct trans
ations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
in complete agreement with the known > facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous > > effects discovered by Hubel and Wiesel, but not explained by them. > > Besides these results (1), (2), (3) which were original (and in part > > even shocking) because of the unusual dire
etween number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory mak
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mammals in complete agreement with the known facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous effects disco=ered by Hubel and Wiesel, but not explained by them. Besides these results (1), (2), (3) wh=ch were original (and in part even shocking) because of the unusual direct trans
lations between number and size of elements, as = necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as He=b's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "th= most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making= unencum
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mammals in complete agreement with the known facts of cortical anatomy and sufficient to explain all the miraculous effects disco=ered by Hubel and Wiesel, but not explained by them. Besides these results (1), (2), (3) wh=ch were original (and in part even shocking) because of the unusual direct trans
lations between number and size of elements, as = necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as He=b's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "th= most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making= unencum
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (8)
Entities connected to both Wiesel and Moshe Abeles'
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON11 w/ Wiesel·10 w/ Moshe
VB
Valentino Braitenberg
PERSON10 w/ Wiesel·10 w/ Moshe
Cell Assemblies
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Wiesel·9 w/ Moshe
Synfire Chains
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Wiesel·8 w/ Moshe
Valentino
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Wiesel·8 w/ Moshe
Freiburg
LOCATION3 w/ Wiesel·3 w/ Moshe
Hubei
LOCATION3 w/ Wiesel·2 w/ Moshe
A(
Ad Aertsen (
PERSON2 w/ Wiesel·2 w/ Moshe