and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by

n number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work', I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

n number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumber

number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumber