etween number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making,

lations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work', I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb

lations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb

etween number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory mak

ations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb

ations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb

ations between number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumb

etween number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory mak

lations between number and size of elements, as = necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as He=b's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "th= most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making= unencum

lations between number and size of elements, as = necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as He=b's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "th= most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making= unencum