4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
upp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the f
f 100 nsor & Associates Itcpanitnc had lranuripturri Inc 1 2 3 INDEX WITNESS: Page 3 PAGE: DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 4 BY MR. TEIN: 5 6 7 NOEXHIBITS MARKED 8 9 CERTIFIED QUESTIONS 10 Page Line 53 22 11 55 1 59 2 12 111 14 112 2 13 14 15 16 17 78 19 20 21 22 23 24
tipp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the f
of 100 nsor & Associates Hopnrtua blIll Trams ripon, Inc 1 2 WITNESS: INDEX Page 3 PAGE: 3 DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 4 BY MR. TEIN: 5 6 7 NOEXHIBITS MARKED 8 9 CERTIFIED QUESTIONS 10 Page Line 53 22 11 55 1 59 2 12 111 14 112 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
. Supp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the ----E4eventh-Gireuit-Geurt-ef-Appeels-adepted-as-binding-preeedent-aIl dwisiuns of 3ho
9 of 100 nsor & Associates Repnrnnp and Transcri pan Inc 1 2 WITNESS: INDEX Page 3 PAGE: 3 DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 4 BY MR. TEIN: 5 6 7 NOEXHIBITS MARKED 8 - - - 9 CERTIFIED QUESTIONS 10 Page Line 53 22 11 55 1 59 2 12 111 14 112 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2
pp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1.981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard. 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the -----Laieventh-Cifeklit-Goen-of-Appeals-adepted-as-binding-preeedent-all dvcisiuns of
ge 29 of 100 sor & Associates Rep/irons and Traucripuna, 1 2 3 INDEX WITNESS: Page 3 PAGE: DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 4 BY MR. TEIN: 5 6 7 NOEXHIBITS MARKED - 23 24 25 Page - CERTIFIED QUESTIONS Line 53 22 55 1 59 2 111 14 112 2 Ph. - Fax. 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 50
Entities connected to both Bonner v. City of and NOEXHIBITS

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONFifth Circuit
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Anderson
PERSONMySpace
ORGANIZATION
Michael Douglas
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONRobert D. Critton
PERSON
Wellington
LOCATIONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
West Palm Beach
LOCATION
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON