Epstein Secrets

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion

yet known whether a settlement will even be reached, much less whether any resulting settlement agreement will even be filed in the court record. B. Special Confidentiality Concerns Raised by This Case In addition to the general rule that settlement conferences are confidential, the involvement of Jeffrey Epstein or other third partie

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DE159). Epstein's motio

ure, because it is not yet known whether a settlement will even be reached, much less whether the agreement would include a confidentiality clause. B. Special Confidentiality Concerns Raised by This Case In addition to the general rule that settlement conferences are confidential, the 4 The settlement agreement was entered into the cour

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion

yet known whether a settlement will even be reached, much less whether any resulting settlement agreement will even be filed in the court record. B. Special Confidentiality Concerns Raised by This Case In addition to the general rule that settlement conferences are confidential, the involvement of Jeffrey Epstein or other third partie

ved to intervene on multiple occasions. His first "Motion for Limited Intervention" was filed in 2011 and was based on the same grounds advanced by Attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Leflcowitz (see DE93). The district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI59). Epstein's motion

ure, because it is not yet known whether a settlement will even be reached, much less whether the agreement would include a confidentiality clause. B. Special Confidentiality Concerns Raised by This Case In addition to the general rule that settlement conferences are confidential, the involvement of Jeffrey Epstein or other third partie