Epstein Secrets

[email protected]> To: Corina Tamita Subject: additional names Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:43:17 +0000 sorry to hear it On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Valentino Braitenberg <[email protected]> wrote: Dear Jeffery, Valentino is ill and not able to reply at present. If he would be able, he would say

and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To:' Subject: Fwd: Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:09:59 +0000 Forwarded message From: Valentino Braitenberg <valentino.braitenberg@tuebingen mpg.de> Date: Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM Subject: Re: To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> There was a

n number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work', I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

From: "Valentino Braitenberg" To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Re: Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:16:33 +0000 who is? and how do you know? -- Original M

n number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

From: "Valentino Braitenberg" To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:14:24 +0000 Dear Jeffery, Valentino is ill and not able to r

and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumber

To: From: Sent: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Fri 8/14/2009 4:29:09 PM Fwd: Forwarded message From: Valentino Braitenberg Date: Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM Subject: Re: To: Jeffrey Epstein icevacationegmail.com> There was a time when anatomy was considered a harmles

number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

To: Valentino Braitenberg From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Wed 8/12/2009 8:48:20 PM Subject: Re: who is doin the best work on signal processing (wavelet or other analysis ) of

number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Wed 8/26/2009 6:09:59 PM Subject Fwd: Forwarded message From: Valentino Braitenberg Date: Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM Subject: Re: To: Jeffrey Epstein jeevacationegmail.com> There was a time when anatomy was considered a harmles

number and size of elements, as a necessary contribution to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumbered by mathema

To: Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] From: Valentino Braitenberg Sent: Mon 8/24/2009 4:14:24 PM Subject: Re: Dear Jeffery, Valentino is ill and not able to reply at present. If he would be able, he would say

and size of elements, as a necessary contribution > > to general theories of cortical function (such as Hebb's Cell Assemblies or > > Moshe Abeles' Synfire Chains). > > > > All told, if you want to know "the most promising part of our work", I > > think it is a rather relaxed way of theory making, unencumber