Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of
65 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. a at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(2)(1) Finally. Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of
5 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. (1 at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of
at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. (a. at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of
65 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. a at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (61)
Entities connected to both Initial Disclosures and The Courts
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
Kenneth Marra
PERSON6 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
the Federal Rules of Civil
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
Michael Jackson
PERSON5 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
ST
Subpoena Duces Tecum
PERSON5 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
George W. Bush
PERSON5 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
United States
LOCATION5 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
HI
Hickman
PERSON4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON5 w/ Initial·3 w/ The
Carnegie
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
Michael Douglas
PERSON4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
WR
Wright
PERSON4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
WA
Wayte
PERSON4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
Table
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
Main Justice
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
Atlanta Gas Light Co.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The
The Eighth Circuit
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Initial·4 w/ The