Epstein Secrets

what this "tuning" should involve - namely, making a system possessing mind-state sequences that correspond meaningfully to world-state sequences. CogPrime's overall design and particular cognitive processes are reasonably well interpreted as an attempt to achieve this for everyday human goals and envir

ive development of humans and human-like AGI systems, but in Table 11.1 we present them in a slightly more general context, using two examples: the Piagetan example of the human (or humanlike) mind as it develops from infancy to maturity; and also the example of the "origin of life" and the development

refining inference control. EFTA00623977 202 11 Stages of Cognitive Development A problem commonly used to illustrate the difference between the Piagetan concrete opera- tional and formal stages is that of figuring out the rules for making pendulums swing quickly versus slowly pins'. If you ask a chil

concepts in one of Douglas HoEstadter's books. Naturally, real concept heterarchies are far more large, complex and tangled than even this one. In CogPrime, ECAN enforces heterarchy via building SymmetricHebbianLinks, and PLN by building SimilarityLinks, IntensionalSimilarityLinks and ExtensionalSimilar

vironment, without requiring anywhere near a complete simulation of realistic physics. EFTA00624075 300 16 AC1 Preschool Fig. 16.1: Part 1 of a Piagetan conservation of volume experiment: a child observes that two glasses obviously have the same amount of milk in them, and then sees the content of on

, etc. And, as typical, not necessarily representative examples of tasks psychologists use to mea- sure cognitive development (drawn mainly from the Piagetan tradition, without implying any assertion that this is the only tradition worth pursuing), consider the following: 1. Which row has more circles- A

ut what this "tuning" should involve — namely, making a system possessing mind-state sequences that correspond meaningfully to world-state sequences. CogPrime’s overall design and particular cognitive processes are reasonably well interpreted as an attempt to achieve this for everyday human goals and enviro

itive development of humans and human-like AGI systems, but in Table 11.1 we present them in a slightly more general context, using two examples: the Piagetan example of the human (or humanlike) mind as it develops from infancy to maturity; and also the example of the “origin of life’ and the development of

inference control. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013117 202 11 Stages of Cognitive Development A problem commonly used to illustrate the difference between the Piagetan concrete opera- tional and formal stages is that of figuring out the rules for making pendulums swing quickly versus slowly [P58]. If you ask a child

n concepts in one of Douglas Hofstadter’s books. Naturally, real concept heterarchies are far more large, complex and tangled than even this one. In CogPrime, ECAN enforces heterarchy via building SymmetricHebbianLinks, and PLN by building SimilarityLinks, IntensionalSimilarityLinks and ExtensionalSimilari

, etc. And, as typical, not necessarily representative examples of tasks psychologists use to mea- sure cognitive development (drawn mainly from the Piagetan tradition, without implying any assertion that this is the only tradition worth pursuing), consider the following: 1. Which row has more circles- A

nt, without requiring anywhere near a complete simulation of realistic physics. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013215 300 16 AGI Preschool Fig. 16.1: Part 1 of a Piagetan conservation of volume experiment: a child observes that two glasses obviously have the same amount of milk in them, and then sees the content of one

e Sam Adams and his colleagues at IBM have created a cognitive architecture called Joshua Blue IAABL02], which has some significant similarities to CogPrime. Similar to our current research direction with CogPrime, Joshua Blue was created with loose emulation of child cognitive development in mind; and,

led "cognitive complete- ness" is necessary and sufficient for efficient general intelligence at the level of an inteligent adult human (e.g. at the Piagetan formal level IP ia531). Of course, the above considerations are very, far from a rigorous mathematical proof (or even precise formulation) of this

ue Sam Adams and his colleagues at IBM have created a cognitive architecture called Joshua Blue [AABLO2], which has some significant similarities to CogPrime. Similar to our current research direction with CogPrime, Joshua Blue was created with loose emulation of child cognitive development in mind; and, a

lled “cognitive complete- ness” is necessary and sufficient for efficient general intelligence at the level of an inteligent adult human (e.g. at the Piagetan formal level [Pia53]). Of course, the above considerations are very far from a rigorous mathematical proof (or even precise formulation) of this hyp