Epstein Secrets

inate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? ___ Yes No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? — Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? — Yes No 9. Does this case originatefrom a matt

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to

nate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes S. No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes I_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No 9. Does this case originate from a ma

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and ■.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to th

case originate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to (1 1,,2003.> Yes S. No this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to 11, 1999? _ Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No Does this case originate from a matter pend

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to