Epstein Secrets

nt 11: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; • Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count #: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 1 I: IS. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and no

Count 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count ,#: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; * Max,Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count W: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds arc hereby frozen and not

t ti: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count, #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; * Max,Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count W: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11; 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not