Epstein Secrets

m a matter pending in the United States Anomey's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes X No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Northe

s application would expand that review and, accordingly, your Affiant requests the issuance of a search warrant in accordance with United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 115-21 (1984). 23. As explained above, Epstein instructed one of his assistants to photograph C using a digital camera; M reported

his application would expand that review and, accordingly, your Affiant requests the issuance of a search warrant in accordance with United States' Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 115-21 (1984). 23. As explained above, Epstein instructed one of his assistants to photograph C using a digital camera; M reported

m a matter pending in the United States Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes X No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Norther

his application would expand that review and, accordingly, your Affiant requests the issuance of a search warrant in accordance with United States' Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 115-21 (1984). 23. As explained above, Epstein instructed one of his assistants to photograph' using a digital camera;, reported Ep

a matter pending in the United States Attorneys Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes X No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Norther

his application would expand that review and, accordingly, your Affiant requests the issuance of a search warrant in accordance with United States' Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 115-21 (1984). 23. As explained above, Epstein instructed one of his assistants to photograph C using a digital camera; M reported

a matter pending in the United States Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Northern

s application would expand that review and, accordingly, your Affiant requests the issuance of a search warrant in accordance with United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 115-21 (1984). 23. As explained above, Epstein instructed one of his assistants to photograph Musing a digital camera; Illeported E

a matter pending in the United States Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes X No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Northe

s application would expand that review and, accordingly, your Affiant requests the issuance of a search warrant in accordance with United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 115-21 (1984). 23. As explained above, Epstein instructed one of his assistants to photograph C using a digital camera; M reported

m a matter pending in the United States Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes 21_ No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the North

s application would expand that review and, accordingly, your Affiant requests the issuance of a search warrant in accordance with United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 115-21 (1984). 23. As explained above, Epstein instructed one of his assistants to photograph, using a digital camera,. reported Ep

a matter pending in the United States Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes X No 3. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) of the United States Attorney's Office prior to May 18, 2003? Yes X No 4. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the North

s application would expand that review and, accordingly, your Affiant requests the issuance of a search warrant in accordance with United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 115-21 (1984). 23. As explained above, Epstein instructed one of his assistants to photograph C using a digital camera; M reported