Epstein Secrets

in the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X_ No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENALTY SHEET Defendant's Name: DEBRA VILLEGAS Case No: Count #: 1 18 U.S.C. § 195600; Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; • Max.Penalty: 10 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine or twice the amount of criminally derived property involved in the transaction. Count #: 2

orthern Region of the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes )C No 10. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X_ No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office p

unt #: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; • Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count #: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? Yes X No 10. 11 Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X__ No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office pri

unt #: I 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count #: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes __X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the V.S. Attorney's Of

nt 11: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; • Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count #: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

orthern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes X No 10. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes _X— No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office p

Count 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count ,#: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; * Max,Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count W: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

he Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X._ No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office

t ti: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count, #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; * Max,Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count W: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349