Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26, 2019, Judge McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Coip., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the Government's application. Martindell held that a party should not provide documents subject to 3 EFTA0
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26, 2019, Judge McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Coip., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the Government's application. Martindell held that a party should not provide documents subject to 3 EFTA0
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26, 2019, Judge McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Coip., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the Government's application. Martindell held that a party should not provide documents subject to 3 EFTA0
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nt's ex parte application. In a hearing on March 26, 2019, Judge McMahon explained that she believed the Second Circuit's decision in Martindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Coip., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), governed the Government's application. Martindell held that a party should not provide documents subject to 3 EFTA0
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (40)
Entities connected to both International Telephone & Telegraph Coip and Minpeco S.A.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON4 w/ International·7 w/ Minpeco
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·7 w/ Minpeco
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON4 w/ International·7 w/ Minpeco
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·6 w/ Minpeco
CS
Conticommodity Servs
PERSON4 w/ International·6 w/ Minpeco
Julie K. Brown
PERSON4 w/ International·6 w/ Minpeco
MA
Martindell
PERSON4 w/ International·6 w/ Minpeco
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON4 w/ International·6 w/ Minpeco
PE
Perlman
PERSON4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
CO
Conboy
PERSON4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
the Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
Lugosch
PERSON4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
RA
Rajaratnam
PERSON4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
Onondaga
LOCATION4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
PA
Payner
PERSON4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
FI
Fisher
PERSON4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
CA
Canfield
PERSON4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
SA
Salamelz
PERSON4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco
Andover Data Servs
ORGANIZATION4 w/ International·5 w/ Minpeco