Epstein Secrets

es not cite the applicable civil rule is that it has yet to state clearly whether it is willing to abide by the civil rules in this case. See, e.g., Gov't Resp. Mot. Order Not Withhold Evid., DE #59 at 6-7 (refusing to take a position on whether civil rules apply or not). Indeed, the Government has yet to

sing with those that it does not. 9 Epstein, however, has sent in his surrogates to litigate in this case, including his criminal defense attorneys Roy Black et al. and an attorney who has represented persons close to him, Bruce Reinhart. 20 EFTA00304761 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 127 Entered on FLSD D

es not cite the applicable civil rule is that it has yet to state clearly whether it is willing to abide by the civil rules in this case. See, e.g., Gov't Resp. Mot. Order Not Withhold Evid., DE #59 at 6-7 (refusing to take a position on whether civil rules apply or not). Indeed, the Government has yet to

sing with those that it does not. 9 Epstein, however, has sent in his surrogates to litigate in this case, including his criminal defense attorneys Roy Black et al. and an attorney who has represented persons close to him, qtr 20 EFTA00204911 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/

against Jeffrey Epstein in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, . . [the victims] cannot invoke any protections under the CVRA." Gov't Resp. at 8. This sweeping position is simply irreconcilable with § 3771(c)(I) of the CVRA. If an indictment is a prerequisite to CVRA rights, then depar

The defense attorneys have no interest in that "transaction" — it concerns only the crime victims, the Government, and Jeffrey Epstein. Simply put, Roy Black et al. have no recognized "interest" in whether or not the Court finds that the Government failed (for example) to confer with Jane Doc #1 and Jane Doe #