Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00726931

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ork, and it did not matter that notice was provided to him in compliance with state law rather than pursuant to SORNA. United States v Madera (2007, MD Fla) 474 FSupp 2d 1257 (criticized in United States v Smith (2007, ED Mich) 481 FSupp 2d 846) and (criticized in United States v Muzio (2007, ED Mo) 200

, DC Utah) 520 FSupp 2d 1341) and (criticized in United States v Howell (2007, ND Iowa) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 83224) and (criticized in United States v Mantia (2007, WD La) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 96018) and (criticized in United States v Gould (2007, DC Md) 526 F Supp 2d 538) and (criticized in United States v

EFTA00726925

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

n, 42 USCS §§ 16914, 16916, there was insufficient evidence to transform SORNA from civil scheme into criminal penalty. United States v Mason (2007, MD Fla) 510 F Supp 2d 923 (criticized in United States v Muzio (2007, ED Mo) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 54330) and (criticized in United States v Cole (2007, SD 11

7, SD 111) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 68522) and (criticized in United States v Gill (2007, DC Utah) 520 F Supp 2d 1341) and (criticized in United States v Mantia (2007, WD La) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 96018) and (criticized in United States v Howell (2008, ND Iowa) 2008 US Dist LEXIS 7810). EFTA00726926

EFTA00726951

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

07, SD Ill) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 68522) and (criticized in United States v Gill (2007, DC Utah) 520 F Supp 2d 1341) and (criticized in United States v Mantia (2007, WD La) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 96018) and (criticized in United States v Howell (2008, ND Iowa) 2008 US Dist LEXIS 7810). Defendant's constitutio