on to Dismiss (eg that there were 2 Grand Juries and that there was some form of recusal of SD Fla in favor of the MD Fla transfer (the role of the MD Fla and the limitation of authority of the SD Fla remain unclear given that Marie V and others at SD Fla continue to run litigation, making filings in o

n, 42 USCS §§ 16914, 16916, there was insufficient evidence to transform SORNA from civil scheme into criminal penalty. United States v Mason (2007, MD Fla) 510 F Supp 2d 923 (criticized in United States v Mario (2007, ED Mo) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 54330) and (criticized in United States v Cole (2007, SD 11

ork, and it did not matter that notice was provided to him in compliance with state law rather than pursuant to SORNA. United States v Madera (2007, MD Fla) 474 FSupp 2d 1257 (criticized in United States v Smith (2007, ED Mich) 481 FSupp 2d 846) and (criticized in United States v Muzio (2007, ED Mo) 200

n, 42 USCS §§ 16914, 16916, there was insufficient evidence to transform SORNA from civil scheme into criminal penalty. United States v Mason (2007, MD Fla) 510 F Supp 2d 923 (criticized in United States v Muzio (2007, ED Mo) 2007 US Dist LEXIS 54330) and (criticized in United States v Cole (2007, SD 11

ork, and it did not matter that notice was provided to him in compliance with state law rather than pursuant to SORNA. United States v Madera (2007, MD Fla) 474 FSupp 2d 1257 (criticized in United States v Smith (2007, ED Mich) 481 FSupp 2d 846) and (criticized in United States v Muzio (2007, ED Mo) 200

article, and has a new file opened by Jacksonville office on/about 11-24-10 which was communicating with Miami, pgs 106-8. (Jacksonville is within MD Fla) MGW Martin G Weinberg PC 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Bo Tel EFTA00698120