Epstein Secrets

WARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates. , JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, iterbuly Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. EFTA00722689 g e sz LEOPOLD—KUVIN, CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS April 10, 2009 Fax and Mail Robert Critton, Esq. Michael Pike, Esq. (hi in et. al. Re: gi v. JEFFREY EPSTEI

fore the court; judge expan- ded parameters of permitted discovery to a fishing expedition which "might give rise to a potential cause of action." West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). '706 Sharon Lee Stedman, of Sharon Lee Stedman, PA., Orlando, and Jack E. Carstensen of Rigdon, Alexander & Rigdon,

rad Edwards and Associates, LLC HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, and JACK A GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger EFTA00614419 g e sz LEOPOLD—KUVIN, CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS April 10, 2009 Fax and Mail Robert Critton, Esq. Michael Pike, Esq. Burman Critton, et. al. MEM Re: inv. J

efore the court; judge expan- ded parameters of permitted discovery to a fishing expedition which "might give rise to a potential cause of action." West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1). '706 Sharon Lee Stedman, of Sharon Lee Stedman, PA., Orlando, and Jack E. Carstensen of Rigdon, Alexander & Rigdon,

South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suitk,Q0 est Palm Beach, FL 33401. LEOPOLD—KUVIN, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 alm Beach Garde i 410 T. KUVIN, Esq. ar No.: 089737 Page 3of 3 EFTA00180827 Page 2 of I I Westla

.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. C 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspeprft=1-ITML

nue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suit est Palm Beach, FL 33401. LEOPOLD—KM/TN, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 ens, FL 33410 (facsimile) T. KUV1N, Esq. ar No.: 089737 Page 3of 3 EFTA00231327 Page 2 of I I Wds

ppeal in deciding whether to grant stay include moving party's likelihood of success on merits, and likelihood of harm should stay not be granted. West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(f). [31 Child Custody 76D etzz9OS 76D Child Custody 76DX111 Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk905 k. Transfer of Cause and