Epstein Secrets

To be Argued By: JAY P. LEFKOWITZ New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 e€u laurk Supreme Trani APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

soned, evidence-based disavowal by the People of the Board's recommendation (based on the People's communications with the Florida prosecutor), the SORA Court relied wholesale upon the Board's recommendation. See A.93:21, 94:6-95:9 25 EFTA00792373 (Tr.). The Court improperly overlooked the burden of pr

• • a To be Argued By: JAY P. LEPKOWITZ New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 '.ex 'Dark Sul:mettle Tourt APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OP NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEI

soned, evidence-based disavowal by the People of the Board's recommendation (based on the People's communications with the Florida prosecutor), the SORA Court relied wholesale upon the Board's recommendation. See A.93:21, 94:6-95:9 25 EFTA00181085 EFTA00181086 (Tr.). The Court improperly overlooked t

r EFTA00231539 RECORD PRESS, INC., 229 West 36th Street, N.Y. 10018-28829 www.recordpress.com EFTA00231540 To be Argued By: JAY P. LEFKOWITZ New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 Xeftr larrrit $upratte Txxurt APPELLATE DIVISION—FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPST

soned, evidence-based disavowal by the People of the Board's recommendation (based on the People's communications with the Florida prosecutor), the SORA Court relied wholesale upon the Board's recommendation. See A.93:21, 94:6-95:9 25 EFTA00231572 (Tr.). The Court improperly overlooked the burden of pr

FTA00232659 RECORD PRESS. INC., 229 West 36th Street, U.Y. 10018-28829 www.reconlpress.com EFTA00232660 I To be Argued By: JAY P. LEFicowrrz New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 Nefn V.arit *inane &curt APPELLATE DIVISION-FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

soned, evidence-based disavowal by the People of the Board's recommendation (based on the People's communications with the Florida prosecutor), the SORA Court relied wholesale upon the Board's recommendation. See A.93:21, 94:6-95:9 25 EFTA00232692 (Tr.). The Court improperly overlooked the burden of pr